Wednesday, 5 February 2014

Rough Cut 2

Rough Cut 2


On Friday my group and I presented our rough cut 2 to our peers, Chantelle and Joyce both said that they liked the tittle that was used when stated to characters and the others and the way it was displayed. it was just anywhere you could see that it was well thought of and positioned to not be a distraction of what was going on in the actual film introduction.
They also said that they like the shaky camera parts that were included. it was only shaky when needed and wasn`t just shaky for the sake of it and the fact that it didn`t continued throughout the film.

An improvement is to change the lighting at the beginning when showing the director of the play a flowing into the introduction , however another peer (Luke )did say he liked the way we filmed and how it happened because it looked like one fluent transition when flowing into the beginning scene of the film introduction without interruption.


1 comment:

  1. Your choice of linking the actor credits to characters on screen works. Think about the animation of your production company name - is it necessary or appropriate for genre? Make sure Sephora's last name appears in the 'shadow' title as well. Check your film for continuity - at the moment the camera gets set down twice without being picked up in between.

    ReplyDelete